|
|
|
Chicago Out-of-State Counsel Attorneys
Lawyer Blogs |
2013/09/25 11:32
|
Local Counsel for Out-of-State Clients
Companies need attorneys who understand the business-to-business and government procurement environments. Having an attorney focused specifically in the business counsel marketplace can help focus on practical solutions.
Chicago based firm serves Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois or Wake County, North Carolina. We deal with clients who have been served with complaints and disputes. If you find yourself having disputes with another company, don't hesitate to contact us for local representation. Are you out-of-state? That will not be a problem because we also offer local counsel for out-of-state clients and treat you just the same regardless of your location.
Commercial litigation can take a toll on businesses, especially when the unexpected happens. We know that it can also place an emotional and financial burdern on a business. With our experienced lawyers' in-depth knowledge of local laws and procedures, we can handle every aspect of your case so that you can concentrate on expanding your business for success.
The firm also advises businesses and entrepreneurs with legal issues regarding regulatory matters, so that they stay in compliance with Illinois administrative and statutory provisions governing their businesses. This will help guide employers in the review, drafting, and implementation of employment policies for a successful future. We have seen some businesses fail because of poor planning in their business needs. So, there is good reason to contact a business attorney for guidance.
The attorneys of The Roth Law Group treat every client as if they are the firm's most important client, no matter where you are located. For the highest quality legal advice in Chicago call us at 312-419-9599 or 919-654-6751 for our Norh Carolina office to talk with a local, Cook County or Wake County lawyer about the legal needs of your business. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manassas Family Law and Divorce Litigation Attorney
Law Firm News |
2013/09/23 11:17
|
The Law Offices of Tenecia P. Reid is dedicated to providing outstanding and creative legal solutions to clients throughout Northern Virginia.
Specializing in family law for her entire career, Attorney Tenecia P. Reid stands ready to skillfully guide you through the divorce litigation process. Divorce litigation can be frustrating, confusing, and emotional, so it is imperative to have an attorney who both listens and treats you with respect as you face major life decisions.
Widely experienced, Attorney Reid has negotiated and litigated cases that include complex marital assets, tax issues, business valuations, underwater joint mortgages, adultery, abuse, protective orders, and bankruptcy issues. Attorney Reid is also intimately familiar with the laws governing fault-based divorce cases, and can help you to determine whether you have one or more fault grounds against your spouse and how you may prove them.
A sharp negotiator with a confident courtroom presence, Attorney Reid also wants her clients to understand each step of the process and communicates accordingly. Whether you are considering divorce or have just been served with a divorce complaint, consulting with our office can help you confidently assess your situation and prepare for the best possible outcome.
Our firm is ready to help you navigate through the legal process and find the best possible outcome to difficult situations.
Address:
9214 Center St
Third Floor
Manassas, Virginia 20110
Contact:
Phone: (703) 393-1000
Fax: (703) 574-8936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wenatchee lawyer picked for federal judgeship
Lawyer Media News |
2013/09/23 11:16
|
The White House has nominated Wenatchee lawyer Stanley Bastian to become Eastern Washington's newest federal judge.
If approved by the Senate, he would replace Judge Edward Shea on the bench in Richland.
Bastian is a 1983 University of Washington Law School graduate who has served as an assistant city attorney in Seattle and as a state Appeals Court law clerk. He joined a Wenatchee firm in 1988.
The Spokesman-Review reports in the 1990s Bastian was hired by Douglas County to defend sheriff's investigators and prosecutors who were sued for their roles in the discredited Wenatchee sex ring case.
The Tri-City Herald reports Shea was the first federal judge to be based full-time in the Tri-Cities and went on senior status in June 2012, with a reduced workload.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed court nixes NJ appeal in sports betting case
Attorney Opinions |
2013/09/18 14:54
|
A federal appeals court dealt another blow to New Jersey's efforts to legalize sports gambling Tuesday, upholding a ruling that the state's betting law conflicts with federal law and shouldn't be implemented.
The case was heard by a three-judge panel at the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, and the state could seek to have the case re-heard by the full appeals court. But Tuesday's ruling more likely means New Jersey's last chance to legalize sports gambling is to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.
A spokesman for Gov. Chris Christie didn't immediately return a message seeking comment Tuesday, but in the past Christie has said he would go to the nation's highest court if necessary.
Voters passed a sports betting referendum in 2011, and last year New Jersey enacted a law that limited bets to the Atlantic City casinos and the state's horse racing tracks. Bets wouldn't be taken on games involving New Jersey colleges or college games played in the state. Christie said at the time that he hoped to grant sports betting licenses by early this year, but those plans were put on hold.
The NFL, NBA, NHL, Major League Baseball and the NCAA sued the state last year, and the NCAA moved several of its championship events out of New Jersey, though it later relented.
The leagues said the betting law could harm the sanctity of the games. In a court deposition, MLB commissioner Bud Selig said he was "appalled" by Christie's actions.
Attorneys for the state had attacked the 1992 federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act on several constitutional levels. They argued the law unfairly "grandfathered" Nevada, Oregon, Montana and Delaware, which each had some form of sports gambling at the time, and said the law violated state sovereignty and equal protection provisions and trampled the authority of state legislatures under the 10th Amendment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court: Texas can use existing voting maps in 2014
Headline Legal News |
2013/09/09 11:57
|
A federal court said Friday it will not delay Texas' primary elections and ordered the state to use political maps drawn by the Legislature — but only temporarily, while the judges sort out a complex and possibly precedent-setting lawsuit.
The three-judge panel in San Antonio gave both sides in the lawsuit over Texas' voting maps reason to claim victory. The court will not draw its own map for the 2014 elections, as civil rights groups wanted, but it also did not throw out the lawsuit completely, as Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott requested.
The court order, signed by all three judges, also allows the civil rights and minority groups to argue that all changes to Texas election law should be reviewed by federal authorities before they can be implemented. The Justice Department has sought to intervene in the case after a recent Supreme Court decision requiring Congress to make changes to the Voting Rights Act.
The fundamental issue of the lawsuit, filed in 2011, is whether the Legislature illegally drew political maps that intentionally diminish the voting power of minorities in Texas. Abbott's office has argued in court papers that Republicans who control the Legislature drew maps to boost the chances of their party — which is legal — and that if minorities who vote predominantly Democratic are hurt as a result, that does not constitute a civil rights violation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee OKs school spending report for WA court
Press Release |
2013/09/03 19:44
|
A committee overseeing progress on paying the full cost of basic education for kids in public school voted unanimously Tuesday to approve a draft of its latest progress report to the state Supreme Court.
In its decision on a lawsuit brought by a coalition of school districts, parents and education groups _ known as the McCleary case for the family named in the suit _ the high court ruled in January 2012 that the state is not meeting its constitutional obligation concerning education funding. In the ruling, the Supreme Court ordered the Legislature to make yearly progress reports on its efforts. Those reports are then critiqued by the group that brought the lawsuit, and by the Supreme Court.
This year, the Legislature allocated about $1 billion more for basic education for the current two-year budget cycle. Lawmakers estimate they need to find a total of between $3.5 billion to $4.5 billion more over the coming years to fully pay for basic education. |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
