|
|
|
Supreme Court to hear car search, tribal land cases
Lawyer Media News |
2008/02/25 11:21
|
| The US Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear three cases, including Arizona v. Gant (07-542) where the Court will consider whether the Fourth Amendment requires law enforcement officers to demonstrate a threat to their safety or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured? Arizona is appealing an Arizona Supreme Court ruling that Rodney Joseph Gant's constitutional rights were violated when police searched his car after he was handcuffed and seated in a polialso heard oral arguments in Warner-Lambert v. Kent, 06-1498, where the Court considered whether federal law preempts a Michigan law that allows personal injury lawsuits against prescription drug manufacturers only when the drug at issue was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration based on the fraudulent submission or withholding of information./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top U.S. court backs S.F. health care
Lawyer Media News |
2008/02/23 13:45
|
| The U.S. Supreme Court allowed San Francisco on Thursday to continue requiring employers to pay part of the cost of providing health care to uninsured residents while a group of restaurant owners tries to overturn the program.pJustice Anthony Kennedy denied a request by the Golden Gate Restaurant Association to suspend the employer contributions while the case awaits an April 17 hearing before an appellate panel. /ppThe city expanded its health care program six weeks ago after winning a ruling from the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. That court allowed city officials to require large and medium-size companies to provide insurance to their employees, at spending levels set by the city, or pay a fee to support care for the uninsured at 22 hospitals and clinics./ppThe expansion lets San Francisco phase in coverage for about 26,000 residents who were not previously eligible for subsidized care. The city says the program will ultimately cover all 73,000 adult residents who are not poor enough for Medi-Cal or old enough for Medicare. About 12,500 people have enrolled so far, program Director Tangerine Brigham said Thursday./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hogan law firm eyes new Legg tower
Press Release |
2008/02/22 14:10
|
| pWashington, D.C., law firm Hogan amp; Hartson is negotiating to take at least 40,000 square feet in the planned Legg Mason Tower, a 24-story office building to be constructed on the fringes of the city's business district at the waterfront Harbor East development. /ppThe law firm would be the first tenant to follow Legg Mason to the new office tower, where rents are said to be the highest in the city. Legg is slated to move by summer 2009 from its signature office building at Light and Pratt streets. /ppHogan has about 45 local lawyers and about 30,000 square feet at Harborplace Tower, a waterfront office building at Calvert and Pratt streets where its lease is set to expire in October. The building is connected to the Gallery shopping mall. /p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Birmingham law firms agree to merger
Press Release |
2008/02/22 14:02
|
| pBirmingham law firm White Arnold amp; Dowd PC and fellow Birmingham firm Summey amp; Hennecy have merged. /ppPartners Sidney C. Summey and Karen M. Hennecy and their staff members recently agreed to join White Arnold amp; Dowd PC, which brings the firm's total staff to 17. /ppThe move strengthens the firm's growing probate and elder law practice, a news release said. /ppSummey has more than 30 years of experience practicing in the probate and civil courts in Alabama and will continue his primary practice of wills, trusts and estates, assistance to litigators handling lawsuits for minors and incompetents, special needs trusts and planning, guardianships and conservatorships, elder law and litigation related to probate issues. /ppHennecy will concentrate her practice on elder law issues, assisting clients and their families with matters including advance directives, durable powers of attorney, wills, trusts, asset preservation and Medicaid planning and administration of the estates of decedents and protected persons. /p!-- Send us your comments More Latest News Buttons -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan banker joins law firm Latham Watkins
Legal Marketing |
2008/02/20 14:10
|
| Daniel Maze has joined Latham amp; Watkins as a partner in its finance department after three years at U.S. investment bank Morgan Stanley the law firm said on Thursday.span id=midArticle_byline/spanspan id=midArticle_0/spanpPrinceton-educated Maze was executive director in Morgan Stanley's leveraged and acquisition finance group./pspan id=midArticle_1/spanpWe have built one of the pre-eminent combined high yield and senior leveraged finance capabilities in the market, and Dan's arrival further bolsters our banking practice, said Andrew Moyle, managing partner in the firm's London office./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US court rules for Medtronic, bars some state suits
Headline Legal News |
2008/02/20 13:46
|
| pThe U.S. Supreme Court handed a victory to Medtronic Inc on Wednesday, ruling that patients cannot sue medical-device manufacturers in state court over harm from a device that has approval from federal regulators./ppBy an 8-1 vote, the court ruled a 1976 law creating federal safety oversight for medical devices bars state-law claims challenging safety or effectiveness of devices that have won premarket approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration./ppThe decision was the Supreme Court's first ruling on the legal effect of the FDA's approval of a medical device on liability lawsuits, Medtronic said./ppThe ruling could benefit other device makers, who have argued that the FDA's judgment that a product is safe and effective should protect companies from being sued for liability in state court./ppThe Medtronic case involved a New York man who was injured in 1996 when a doctor inflated a balloon catheter during an artery-clearing procedure./ppMedtronic has said the doctor in the case used the catheter contrary to labeling instructions and in a patient for whom it was not recommended. The company no longer makes that specific catheter./ppA federal trial court in Albany, New York, dismissed the lawsuit, finding the patient was not entitled to state law remedies because of the FDA's prior approval of the device./ppA U.S. appeals court agreed that the lawsuit was pre-empted by federal law, and the Supreme Court upheld that decision. /p |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
